One retirement exit strategy often considered by solo practitioners and small law firm owners is the "recruit your successor" one. The idea behind this strategy is to find a young, inexperienced lawyer who is then groomed to take over the practice.
Last month, I went out to dinner with some friends. One friend announced to the group that, after working for a large telecommunications company for more than 25 years, he was being offered an opportunity to retire early with some very nice incentives. He further informed us that he had intended to retire within the next year. So, the offer was not going to change his planned retirement date in any significant manner.
After over 15 years advising retiring lawyers, one reality stands out: selling a law firm is far less universal than many believe. A sale assumes transferable client relationships, a willing, capable successor, and a business that can operate independently of the current owner. In smaller firms, those conditions are not always present.
When small firm owners fail to secure a successful exit, it’s rarely a market issue. More often than not, they get in their own way long before the market ever enters the picture. I’ve spent over fifteen years having conversations with lawyers considering retirement, and I’ve noticed a clear pattern. When those conversations don’t progress, it’s rarely because the attorney decided to work with someone else. It’s usually because the lawyer isn’t ready to confront the decisions in front of them. This post will explore some of the most common ways lawyers unintentionally undermine their own exit from practice.
Whether a lawyer works in a firm or as a solo, he or she does not close up shop one day and ride off into the retirement sunset the next. Many lawyers gradually wind down their practices—over months or years—and transition to part-time before retiring completely. Historically, law firms use the “of counsel” designation for lawyers nearing retirement.
Most retiring lawyers assume the most challenging part of selling their firm will be finding the right buyer or negotiating the best deal. In truth, it is the emotional side of the transition that surprises them the most.
It’s a mystery why so many lawyers assume part-time practice is only for new moms and dads. The reality is that part-time work can be a smart and strategic move for senior attorneys who want to step back without stepping away. For solo and small firm lawyers, it provides a gradual transition that maintains strong client relationships, ensures steady income, and allows time to plan for a full retirement.
Succession is perhaps the most significant long-term challenge facing soon-to-be-retired, baby-boomer solo practitioners and small law firm owners. This is understandable, as a variety of psychological and emotional factors stack the odds against you laying the foundation for a smooth transition.
Decades of legal practice mold the brain. But when the work stops, the brain begins to change, bringing consequences that are rarely discussed but widely felt. The legal profession demands constant mental engagement. Over time, this sharpens a lawyer’s ability to anticipate problems and navigate complexity with precision. But emotional transitions don’t follow the same process.
When it comes to planning your law firm’s succession, a primary area of concern for your successor is whether your clients will choose to work with that successor after you leave. One way to assess that is to evaluate the type of goodwill that exists with your clients and whether that goodwill carries any transferrable value.